<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 2.0 vs Web 1.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/</link>
	<description>Ace King, Check it Out!</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Web 1.0 Vs. Web 2.0 &#124; The New Internet Era</title>
		<link>http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-27618</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 1.0 Vs. Web 2.0 &#124; The New Internet Era</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-27618</guid>
		<description>[...] 1.0 use to just for reading, companies, client-server, home pages, and even about hardware costs. You can even go to this website were i got this information the person who wrote this was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1.0 use to just for reading, companies, client-server, home pages, and even about hardware costs. You can even go to this website were i got this information the person who wrote this was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LSM &#187; Nerdin&#8217; it</title>
		<link>http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-27607</link>
		<dc:creator>LSM &#187; Nerdin&#8217; it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-27607</guid>
		<description>[...] Otto att Syntis var web 1.0 och jag web 2.0. En jÃ¤mfÃ¶rande uppstÃ¤llning mellan de tvÃ¥ hittas hÃ¤r, men de riktiga godbitarna finns i kommentarerna: Web 1.0 was one-way, Web 2.0 is two-way. Web 1.0 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Otto att Syntis var web 1.0 och jag web 2.0. En jÃ¤mfÃ¶rande uppstÃ¤llning mellan de tvÃ¥ hittas hÃ¤r, men de riktiga godbitarna finns i kommentarerna: Web 1.0 was one-way, Web 2.0 is two-way. Web 1.0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-27433</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-27433</guid>
		<description>Web 2.0 is web 1.0 with a shiny new Jacket, a jacket that is being worn by every web site that believes that the only way to appeal to people is by using rounded corners and flashy beta tags. Slowly the jacket will get rips and tears as the public catch on to what is blatant marketing propaganda. The term web 2.0 is supposed to signify a 'new' web, but there is nothing 'new' about it. It's still javascript. It's still flash. It's the same thing we have been using before. Sure, now we can collaborate and edit pages, but hasn't this been available already? You say that Google is web 2.0, how may I ask? Apparently web 2.0 is about communities, so I'll see you on Google later. Just because we have integrated existing technologies and packed it into dynamic, flashy, attractive pages does not mean that something new has been created. It just means that we have changed the layout.

Of course, this is only one side of the argument, some may argue that Web 2.0 is a new creation, that allows us to collaborate in ways that we couldn't have done before. My answer to that is, We have been able to. The technology has existed all along, we just haven't harvested it. And as soon as we do, we suddenly have a 'new' web. Sorry, you have not sold me. As far as I'm concerned. Web 2.0 Is just a "bubbl" waiting to burst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web 2.0 is web 1.0 with a shiny new Jacket, a jacket that is being worn by every web site that believes that the only way to appeal to people is by using rounded corners and flashy beta tags. Slowly the jacket will get rips and tears as the public catch on to what is blatant marketing propaganda. The term web 2.0 is supposed to signify a &#8216;new&#8217; web, but there is nothing &#8216;new&#8217; about it. It&#8217;s still javascript. It&#8217;s still flash. It&#8217;s the same thing we have been using before. Sure, now we can collaborate and edit pages, but hasn&#8217;t this been available already? You say that Google is web 2.0, how may I ask? Apparently web 2.0 is about communities, so I&#8217;ll see you on Google later. Just because we have integrated existing technologies and packed it into dynamic, flashy, attractive pages does not mean that something new has been created. It just means that we have changed the layout.</p>
<p>Of course, this is only one side of the argument, some may argue that Web 2.0 is a new creation, that allows us to collaborate in ways that we couldn&#8217;t have done before. My answer to that is, We have been able to. The technology has existed all along, we just haven&#8217;t harvested it. And as soon as we do, we suddenly have a &#8216;new&#8217; web. Sorry, you have not sold me. As far as I&#8217;m concerned. Web 2.0 Is just a &#8220;bubbl&#8221; waiting to burst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 / Day 13 Write a Post Using Comments &#124; Ruminations of an Online Instructor / MD</title>
		<link>http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-27262</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 / Day 13 Write a Post Using Comments &#124; Ruminations of an Online Instructor / MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-27262</guid>
		<description>[...] Drumgoole. May 29th, 2006. Web 2.0 vs Web 1.0. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Drumgoole. May 29th, 2006. Web 2.0 vs Web 1.0. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 umm&#8230;. Why? &#124; I Am Troy</title>
		<link>http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-27183</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 umm&#8230;. Why? &#124; I Am Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 10:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-27183</guid>
		<description>[...] found this comparison list of what Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0 is, or what people beleive it to be. Found at Joe Drumgoole&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] found this comparison list of what Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0 is, or what people beleive it to be. Found at Joe Drumgoole&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 marketing, Web 2.0 Business &#171; The Manchild Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-26928</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 marketing, Web 2.0 Business &#171; The Manchild Chronicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-26928</guid>
		<description>[...] Copacetic Â» Blog Archive Â» Web 2.0 vs Web 1.0  * Web 1.0 was about reading, Web 2.0 is about writing * Web 1.0 was about companies, Web 2.0 is about communities * Web 1.0 was about client-server, Web 2.0 is about peer to peer * Web 1.0 was about HTML, Web 2.0 is about XML * Web 1.0 was about home pages, Web 2.0 is about blogs * Web 1.0 was about portals, Web 2.0 is about RSS * Web 1.0 was about taxonomy, Web 2.0 is about tags * Web 1.0 was about wires, Web 2.0 is about wireless * Web 1.0 was about owning, Web 2.0 is about sharing * Web 1.0 was about IPOs, Web 2.0 is about trade sales * Web 1.0 was about Netscape, Web 2.0 is about Google * Web 1.0 was about web forms, Web 2.0 is about web applications * Web 1.0 was about screen scraping, Web 2.0 is about APIs * Web 1.0 was about dialup, Web 2.0 is about broadband * Web 1.0 was about hardware costs, Web 2.0 is about bandwidth costs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Copacetic Â» Blog Archive Â» Web 2.0 vs Web 1.0  * Web 1.0 was about reading, Web 2.0 is about writing * Web 1.0 was about companies, Web 2.0 is about communities * Web 1.0 was about client-server, Web 2.0 is about peer to peer * Web 1.0 was about HTML, Web 2.0 is about XML * Web 1.0 was about home pages, Web 2.0 is about blogs * Web 1.0 was about portals, Web 2.0 is about RSS * Web 1.0 was about taxonomy, Web 2.0 is about tags * Web 1.0 was about wires, Web 2.0 is about wireless * Web 1.0 was about owning, Web 2.0 is about sharing * Web 1.0 was about IPOs, Web 2.0 is about trade sales * Web 1.0 was about Netscape, Web 2.0 is about Google * Web 1.0 was about web forms, Web 2.0 is about web applications * Web 1.0 was about screen scraping, Web 2.0 is about APIs * Web 1.0 was about dialup, Web 2.0 is about broadband * Web 1.0 was about hardware costs, Web 2.0 is about bandwidth costs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Site to Rule Them All, One Site to Find Them&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-26830</link>
		<dc:creator>One Site to Rule Them All, One Site to Find Them&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-26830</guid>
		<description>[...] Web 1.0 was about reading and Web 2.0 is about writing, then surely the next trend on the web (call it Web 2.1) will be about aggregating the content of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web 1.0 was about reading and Web 2.0 is about writing, then surely the next trend on the web (call it Web 2.1) will be about aggregating the content of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gemini</title>
		<link>http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-26703</link>
		<dc:creator>Gemini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-26703</guid>
		<description>Excellent compilation. I have linked to this list, as I believe it explains the complicated things in a very simple way. Thanks for comments &#38; sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent compilation. I have linked to this list, as I believe it explains the complicated things in a very simple way. Thanks for comments &amp; sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edutopia (2) &#171; TIC e EducaÃ§Ã£o</title>
		<link>http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-26656</link>
		<dc:creator>Edutopia (2) &#171; TIC e EducaÃ§Ã£o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-26656</guid>
		<description>[...] este propÃ³sito eis uma boa enunciaÃ§Ã£o das diferenÃ§as entre web 1.0 e web 2.0, intitulada web 2.0 vs web 1.0. Consideremos esta tabela-sÃ­ntese comparativa dos descritores ou caracterÃ­sticas enunciadas para [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] este propÃ³sito eis uma boa enunciaÃ§Ã£o das diferenÃ§as entre web 1.0 e web 2.0, intitulada web 2.0 vs web 1.0. Consideremos esta tabela-sÃ­ntese comparativa dos descritores ou caracterÃ­sticas enunciadas para [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kapasule</title>
		<link>http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-26559</link>
		<dc:creator>kapasule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2006/05/29/web-20-vs-web-10/#comment-26559</guid>
		<description>This is an eye opener only last week I came to learn about web 2.0 it is really agood revolution and transformation of web 1.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an eye opener only last week I came to learn about web 2.0 it is really agood revolution and transformation of web 1.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
