<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science Week: What invention do you want to see in the future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2007/11/14/science-week-what-invention-do-you-want-to-see-in-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2007/11/14/science-week-what-invention-do-you-want-to-see-in-the-future/</link>
	<description>Ace King, Check it Out!</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Damien Mulley &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Science Week Ireland blogging competition Day 2 - â€œWhat invention do you want to see most in the future?â€?</title>
		<link>http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2007/11/14/science-week-what-invention-do-you-want-to-see-in-the-future/#comment-26443</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Mulley &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Science Week Ireland blogging competition Day 2 - â€œWhat invention do you want to see most in the future?â€?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 23:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2007/11/14/science-week-what-invention-do-you-want-to-see-in-the-future/#comment-26443</guid>
		<description>[...] Joe says a landmine detector. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Joe says a landmine detector. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2007/11/14/science-week-what-invention-do-you-want-to-see-in-the-future/#comment-26436</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joedrumgoole.com/blog/2007/11/14/science-week-what-invention-do-you-want-to-see-in-the-future/#comment-26436</guid>
		<description>Dear Joe,

Link below is one of 7 videos on the subject - you're right about one thing:   the low cost of landmines and high cost of countermeasures.  And no matter how much money is spent, the foot soldier or civilian mostly slog on without hi-tech wonders.

The method used in the clip is controversal, but I made them with the idea others might test the hypothesis.  If it was one of my kids in the Iraq/Afghanistan War, I would hope and pray that any and all methods would be tested - especially low-cost cheap ones.

Low-tech answers, whatever they may be,  are probably the only chance most foot soldiers and civilians have.  DoD has spent hundreds of millions on high-technology devices that have yet to see the battlefield, here 6 years after invading Afghanistan and  4 1/2 in Iraq.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMU9OWaxnSI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Joe,</p>
<p>Link below is one of 7 videos on the subject - you&#8217;re right about one thing:   the low cost of landmines and high cost of countermeasures.  And no matter how much money is spent, the foot soldier or civilian mostly slog on without hi-tech wonders.</p>
<p>The method used in the clip is controversal, but I made them with the idea others might test the hypothesis.  If it was one of my kids in the Iraq/Afghanistan War, I would hope and pray that any and all methods would be tested - especially low-cost cheap ones.</p>
<p>Low-tech answers, whatever they may be,  are probably the only chance most foot soldiers and civilians have.  DoD has spent hundreds of millions on high-technology devices that have yet to see the battlefield, here 6 years after invading Afghanistan and  4 1/2 in Iraq.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMU9OWaxnSI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMU9OWaxnSI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
